PA gain compression vs. AM-PM distortion: which one kills your EVM first?

Started by RF_Bench_Notes · 2026-10-26 13:00 UTC · 6 views · 1 replies
R Member
When a PA starts to misbehave near saturation, two suspects usually show up together: gain compression and AM-PM conversion. I have learned to separate them before touching the matching network. First, run a single-tone power sweep and record AM-AM and AM-PM together; if phase starts moving while gain is still fairly flat, AM-PM is your early warning. Next, check EVM against backoff in 1 dB steps with your real modulated signal, not just CW, because a CW-only view hides the phase contribution. Third, look at the bias point: a PA biased too close to class B will show worse AM-PM at low drive than its datasheet headline suggests. Finally, confirm with a DPD on/off comparison; if DPD fixes EVM but leaves ACPR marginal, the problem is more compression than phase. In my recent bench case, AM-PM was the binding constraint about 2 dB before hard compression showed up. Which one usually bites you first?
A Member
Following this thread. We solved ours with a firmware update - just for reference.
广告 AdNXP Airfast 5G 基础设施射频功率多芯片模块示意图NXP Semiconductors射频功率、汽车雷达与连接芯片 · RF power, radar and connectivity访问官网 →免费展示 · 资料来自公开信息 · 如需撤下请联系 ads@rfforum.com
广告 Ad广告位招商 / Advertise hereads@rfforum.com · 刊例 Rate cardT2 · 728×90
Log in or register to reply.