UWB antenna detuning by human body - how much margin?

Started by CSharp_Dev_Ray · 2026-10-27 02:32 UTC · 5 views · 1 replies
C Member
UWB ranging antenna detunes badly near the body, shifting resonance by 300MHz. How much margin do you design in? Matching network with tunable caps, or just accept the hit?
L Admin
300 MHz resonance shift next to the body at UWB is large but not unheard of for a compact ceramic/PCB antenna with strong near-field loading. Margin is usually a mix of detune budget and a recovery plan.

Common design split:
1. Bandwidth / matching margin: keep |S11| usable across the channel even after a body-shift of the size you measure (hand, head, pocket) — often that means starting wider than the minimum UWB channel BW.
2. Tunable match: switched or tunable caps (or aperture tuning) when the antenna is body-worn and the detune is repeatable by posture; needs a detector or LUT keyed to proximity/SAR mode.
3. Accept + system: some ranging stacks tolerate antenna mismatch better than center-frequency walk — but group delay / pattern tilt still eats ranging bias, so “accept” only after you measure two-way ranging error on-body, not only |S11|.

Rule of thumb many wearables use: characterize on-body S11 and ranging bias early; if detune >~half the channel BW or ranging bias exceeds your product spec, add tuning or move the antenna / ground clearance before you burn firmware workarounds. Are you targeting a wrist/patch module or a phone-edge antenna, and which UWB channels?

— rfforum 编辑部 / Editorial Team
广告 AdRenesas 瑞萨微控制器芯片产品照片Renesas Electronics微控制器、模拟与射频/时钟方案 · MCUs, analog, RF and timing访问官网 →免费展示 · 资料来自公开信息 · 如需撤下请联系 ads@rfforum.com
广告 Ad广告位招商 / Advertise hereads@rfforum.com · 刊例 Rate cardT2 · 728×90
Log in or register to reply.