Gated spectrum measurements for TDD / burst ACLR: trigger, gate width, and the RBW traps

Started by LunaWei · 2026-10-29 03:07 UTC · 8 views · 1 replies
L Admin
CW ACLR habits break the moment the DUT is TDD, pulsed radar, or a bursty Wi-Fi / cellular frame. A spectrum analyser in free-run peak-hold will happily average on and off slots into a number that neither matches the standard nor the PA’s real stress. Gating fixes that — if the gate is honest.

**1. What you are trying to capture**

- **On-slot** ACLR / SEM / occupied BW: only while the PA is transmitting at the power you care about.
- **Off-slot** leakage / residual: a different measurement; do not mix it into the on-slot trace.
- Habit: write on the plot **gate source, gate delay, gate length, and whether video/RF gate** — a screenshot without those is not reproducible.

**2. Trigger and gate alignment**

- Prefer a **frame / TX-enable / marker** trigger from the DUT or baseband, not “I guessed the period from the envelope.”
- Set gate delay/length from a zero-span or demod view of the same trigger so the gate sits inside the settled portion of the burst — not the ramp, not the symbol tail the standard excludes.
- If the analyser only offers periodic gate, measure the frame period carefully; a 1% period error walks the gate across the slot edge over a long sweep.

**3. RBW / detector traps that invent ACLR**

- Too-narrow RBW + short gate → not enough samples inside the gate → noisy or biased ACLR.
- Too-wide RBW → adjacent-channel energy from the main lobe skirts looks like ACLR fail.
- Peak detector + free-run on a pulsed signal → worst-case spikes from ramp / ALC / transient; RMS / average under a correct gate is usually what the radio standard wants — check the method, do not assume.
- Habit: after gating looks good, **disable the gate once** and confirm the trace changes the way you expect (on-slot rises, off-slot floor appears). If nothing changes, you were never gated.

**4. Level and front-end**

- Burst peaks still hit the mixer. Set attenuator / preamp for the **on-slot** crest, not the time-averaged power. Mixer-level lies from continuous-wave habits (see the SA mixer-level threads) get worse with pulsed DUT crest factor.
- External trigger cable delay is part of the measurement — leave it connected when you save the setup.

**5. A short gate sanity checklist**

1. Zero-span: gate box visibly inside the flat-top of the burst.
2. ACLR/SEM with gate on vs a known CW proxy at same Pout (if available) — order of magnitude should agree.
3. Shift gate ±10% of slot width: result should not jump more than your uncertainty unless you were sitting on the edge.
4. Save trigger source + gate params with the trace.

**Discussion**

On your last TDD or pulsed ACLR bring-up, what failed first — gate sitting on the ramp, wrong detector/RBW for the standard, or mixer overload on the burst peak — and do you trigger from a hardware TX-enable or from the RF envelope?

— rfforum 编辑部 / Editorial Team
L Admin
Addendum: free-run peak-hold on TDD/burst ACLR mixes on and off slots; the number then matches neither the standard nor the PA’s real stress.

Gate checklist:
1. Trigger from a stable frame/trigger line, not from the analyser guessing the burst.
2. Gate width covers the on-slot (or the standard’s specified portion) without swallowing guard/off energy you meant to exclude.
3. RBW/VBW and detector must still satisfy the ACLR/SEM method once gated — narrowing RBW to “clean the trace” can invent compliance.

Which RAT / radar timing and are you gating on-slot only or a standard-defined window?

— rfforum 编辑部 / Editorial Team
广告 AdRenesas 瑞萨微控制器芯片产品照片Renesas Electronics微控制器、模拟与射频/时钟方案 · MCUs, analog, RF and timing访问官网 →免费展示 · 资料来自公开信息 · 如需撤下请联系 ads@rfforum.com
广告 Ad广告位招商 / Advertise hereads@rfforum.com · 刊例 Rate cardT2 · 728×90
Log in or register to reply.