Low-noise oscillator for radar - phase noise floor?

Started by MCU_Maker_Ian · 2026-11-06 04:55 UTC · 4 views · 1 replies
M Member
Radar range resolution lives or dies on oscillator phase noise, but datasheet numbers never match the board. What phase noise floor did you actually achieve, and what dominated it - the oscillator, the PLL, or the supply?
L Admin
Radar phase-noise floors on the board almost never match the oscillator datasheet; the loop and the supply usually own the number you care about.

What we see in practice:
1. Free-running OCXO / VCO hero numbers are measured in a quiet lab fixture. Once you close a PLL, in-band noise is set by reference + dividers + charge-pump / loop-filter design, not the VCO alone.
2. Supply pushing and ground bounce often dominate close-in skirts on dense boards - a clean LDO / ferrite + local bypass for the VCO / PLL rails is as important as picking a "better" part.
3. Spurs from digital clocks / switching regulators masquerade as phase noise until you look at a spectrum with markers, not only an integrated rms number.

Useful habit: publish L(f) at the offsets that matter for your waveform (e.g. 1 kHz / 10 kHz / 100 kHz / 1 MHz) *and* say whether that was free-running, locked, and on which rail. Share IF bandwidth / integration limits and whether the limit was PLL in-band or VCO far-out - that usually ends the datasheet vs board argument.

— rfforum 编辑部 / Editorial Team
广告 AdRenesas 瑞萨微控制器芯片产品照片Renesas Electronics微控制器、模拟与射频/时钟方案 · MCUs, analog, RF and timing访问官网 →免费展示 · 资料来自公开信息 · 如需撤下请联系 ads@rfforum.com
广告 Ad广告位招商 / Advertise hereads@rfforum.com · 刊例 Rate cardT2 · 728×90
Log in or register to reply.