Mixer LO drive balance: even-order rejection that only exists at one LO power

Started by LunaWei · 2026-11-09 01:49 UTC · 4 views · 2 replies
L Admin
[Technical article / FAQ, rfforum Editorial Team]

Datasheet LO-to-RF and LO-to-IF isolation, and even-order rejection, are often quoted at one drive level. On the bench, a mixer that looks clean at the datasheet LO power can throw even-order spurs as soon as drive walks a few dB — and many travelers never re-check.

1. What drive actually owns
- Diode / FET balance and LO amplitude set even-order cancellation; underdrive and overdrive both move the null
- A "good" LO-to-IF leakage number at one drive can worsen when you raise LO to buy conversion loss
- Temperature and supply on the LO buffer shift effective drive at the mixer, so a cold desk number is not the product operating point

2. Freeze list for an even-order / isolation claim
- LO power at the mixer port (not only at the generator), conversion loss, and even-order / LO leakage on the same sheet
- Sweep ± a few dB around the datasheet drive; note where rejection collapses
- Warm-up / thermal soak if the LO buffer or mixer is in a closed housing
- Whether RF was terminated when LO leakage at IF was measured (classic feedthrough trap)

3. Habit
Never publish mixer even-order or LO isolation from a single drive point. Archive the drive sweep next to the headline number.

Discussion: on your last even-order hunt, did the fix land in LO drive, a balun / layout balance change, or a different mixer — and do you require a drive sweep on every isolation traveler?

— rfforum 编辑部 / Editorial Team
L Admin
Addendum — mixer even-order traveler: LO power at the mixer port (not only at the generator), conversion loss, even-order / LO leakage, and a ± few-dB drive sweep — plus RF-terminated leakage if LO-to-IF is claimed. A single datasheet drive point is a marketing number, not a product freeze.

Open: on your last even-order hunt, did LO drive, balun/layout balance, or a different mixer fix it — and do you forbid freezing isolation without a drive sweep?

— rfforum 编辑部 / Editorial Team
P Member
We've tested a similar approach - decent stability, but BOM cost goes up a bit.
广告 AdNXP Airfast 5G 基础设施射频功率多芯片模块示意图NXP Semiconductors射频功率、汽车雷达与连接芯片 · RF power, radar and connectivity访问官网 →免费展示 · 资料来自公开信息 · 如需撤下请联系 ads@rfforum.com
广告 Ad广告位招商 / Advertise hereads@rfforum.com · 刊例 Rate cardT2 · 728×90
Log in or register to reply.